Helga Law Journal

Ukioqatigiit
Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Qupperneq 166

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Qupperneq 166
Helga Law Journal Vol. 1, 2021 170 International Legal Research Group 171 freedom of protest.246 A year after the ruling, on 9 December 2010, there was another instance of what Mansfield calls “a dangerous use of police force to quell the protest.”247 The march containing around 15,000 people, most of whom were students and staff, was aimed to protest against cuts in education and the changes in the tuition fees. There was a kettling of the crowd at 3:23 p.m. for nearly 6 hours.248 Moreover, there was another incidence of kettling at Westminster Bridge which involved 3,000-4,000 people being tightly packed in very cold weather conditions. The police also exercised force on the protestors, causing Meadows grave head injury.249 The police response has been condemned by the UN Special rapporteur250. Mansfield argues that these responses by the police are part of a general trend of an increasing use of kettling and police force.251 This confirms Mead’s observation of how the decision in Austin, after which the prevention of disorder became more readily available as a justification for the restriction of the right to freedom of protest, can dangerously threaten such a fundamental human right.252 5.2.3 Stop and Search Powers Additionally, the police are also granted stop and search powers, exercised in order to pre-empt and prevent crimes, particularly in relation to terrorism. Previously, this area was governed by Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, under which the chief constable is authorized to stop and search pedestrians and vehicles if they consider it “expedient” in order to prevent terrorism.253 The open-ended and vague legislative lexis “expedient” potentially has far-reaching consequences on the right to freedom to protest. This is demonstrated in Gillan and Quinton v UK.254 To briefly reiterate the facts, the applicants were Mr Gillan who was on a bicycle and carrying a rucksack, and Ms Quinton, a journalist, who was ordered to stop filming despite showing her press cards. The House of Lords ruled that the right to protest is not an absolute rule. The word “expedient” was interpreted loosely; Lord Bingham suggested that it need not be “necessary,”255 and confirmed the Court of Appeal interpretation of the word which ruled that 246 David Mead, The New Law of Peaceful Protest: Rights and Regulation in the Human Rights Era (Bloomsbury UK 2010) 9-11. 247 Michael Mansfield, ‘A dangerous use of police force to quell protest’, The Guardian, (London, 3 March 2013). 248 ibid. 249 ibid. 250 ibid. 251 (n 29). 252 Mead (n 28) 355. 253 Terrorism Act 2000, Section 44(3). 254 R (on the application of Gillan (FC) and another (FC) (Appellants) v Commissioner of Police of Metropolis and another (Respondents) 2006 UKHL 12. 255 ibid, 15. police can exercise stop and search powers where they consider such an action “advantageous.”256 It has been argued that the word “advantageous” is a very vague interpretation of the legislation which can justify and even encourage significant restrictions to the right to protest.257 This was recognized by the ECtHR, who ruled that section 44 powers unjustifiably interfered with Article 8.258 It held that the first and second stage of the test was fulfilled: s44 powers did have a legal basis, and they did address a legitimate aim: prevention of crime.259 Nevertheless, the third stage of proportionality could not be surpassed. It objected to the interpretation of “expedient” as “advantageous,” the result of which was that there was “no requirement of any assessment of the proportionality of the measure,”260 leading to “a clear risk of arbitrariness in the grant of such a broad discretion to the police officer.”261 These risks were actualised when the 82-year- old Walter Wolfgang was dismissed from the 2005 Labour Party conference for criticizing Jack Straw on Iraq.262 His return was prevented under Section 44. This case shows that the broad way in which Section 44 powers had been defined can infringe on the people’s ability to exercise their right to freedom of protest and the right to freedom of expression. Largely due to the decision in Gillian v UK, the Section 44 powers were repealed and replaced by Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Section 59. This demonstrates the influence of the ECtHR on the UK. Now, the senior police officer can stop and search only if they reasonably suspect that an act of terrorism will take place and reasonably consider that the authorization is necessary to prevent such an act.263 Furthermore, any such power can now exist very restrictively, in terms of space and duration. Spatially, the authorization will apply only to a specified area which the officer reasonably considers no greater than necessary.264 In terms of time, the authorization should be for a specified duration to a maximum of 14 days265 (as opposed to the 28-day period authorized previously)266, and should be confirmed by the Secretary of Space within 48 hours of the issue. The reformed law is relatively much more in favour of the right to peaceful protest. As Cape observes, “the new regime … is significantly more stringent than that under the TA 2000 s.44 and is more likely to satisfy the ECHR 256 ibid, 25. 257 ibid. 258 Gillan and Quinton v UK App no 4158/05 (ECtHR, 12 January 2010). 259 ibid, 65. 260 ibid, 80. 261 ibid, 85. 262 Andrew Sparrow, ‘Heckler, 82, who dared called Straw a liar is held under terrorist law’, the Telegraph, (London, 29 September 2005). 263 Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Section 59. 264 Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Section 59. 265 Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Section 59. 266 Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Section 44.
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184
Qupperneq 185
Qupperneq 186
Qupperneq 187
Qupperneq 188
Qupperneq 189
Qupperneq 190
Qupperneq 191
Qupperneq 192
Qupperneq 193
Qupperneq 194
Qupperneq 195
Qupperneq 196
Qupperneq 197
Qupperneq 198
Qupperneq 199
Qupperneq 200
Qupperneq 201
Qupperneq 202
Qupperneq 203
Qupperneq 204
Qupperneq 205
Qupperneq 206
Qupperneq 207
Qupperneq 208
Qupperneq 209
Qupperneq 210
Qupperneq 211
Qupperneq 212
Qupperneq 213
Qupperneq 214
Qupperneq 215
Qupperneq 216
Qupperneq 217
Qupperneq 218
Qupperneq 219
Qupperneq 220
Qupperneq 221
Qupperneq 222
Qupperneq 223
Qupperneq 224

x

Helga Law Journal

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Helga Law Journal
https://timarit.is/publication/1677

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.