Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Side 170

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Side 170
Helga Law Journal Vol. 1, 2021 174 International Legal Research Group 175 and prevent crimes, and protecting one’s ability to voice their opinion and contribute to public debates via demonstration and protest. 6 What positive obligations does your state assume to guarantee the enjoyment of the right to protest and protection from the interference of private parties? 6.1 Introduction The right to protest is considered a fundamental part of a healthy democracy as it supports an “informed, participatory and active electorate”279 and acts as an “important safety valve”280 for dissenting views. As such, the UK is required to fulfil certain positive obligations in order to guarantee the enjoyment of the right. These obligations require the state to take protective measures to prevent interference by private parties, such as counter-demonstrators or businesses targeted by protestors, and facilitate demonstrations. Part one outlines the legal framework of the right to protest, namely the relevant Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) and the operation of Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which requires all public authorities to act in a Convention compliant manner. Part two focusses on the Police as one of the major public bodies involved in protest activity and how they seek to fulfil their duties to both the public and the protestors. Part three discusses the role of the courts in balancing between the private interests of businesses and the right to protest in deciding orders for injunctions. 6.2 The Legal Framework 6.2.1 The Distinction Between Positive and Negative Obligations Upholding the right to protest entails the state fulfilling both positive and negative obligations. Positive obligations require the state to undertake specific preventative actions to safeguard a particular right whereas a negative obligation is a duty to refrain from impinging on the right itself.281 A breach of a positive obligation occurs when the state fails to act and a breach of a negative obligation would occur via the imposition of a limitation upon the right being exercised – for example if protestors are subject to violence from police authorities there is a breach of a negative obligation as they did not refrain from violence, in contrast, 279 David Mead, The New Law of Peaceful Protest (2010, Hart Publishing) 9. 280 Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary (HMCIC), 'Adapting to Protest' (2009) 40. 281 Jean-Francois Akandji-Kombe, Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: A guide to the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Human Rights Handbooks, Directorate General of Human Rights, no.7, 2007). if counter-protestors are violent towards protestors and the police do not act, there is a breach of a positive obligation by failing to act. 6.2.2 The Relevant Provisions Albeit the right to protest is no stand-alone right, it falls under the scope of Article 11, and a bit less so under Article 11; imposing both positive and negative obligations upon contracting parties such as the UK. Article 11 establishes that all individuals have the “right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others,”’282 such that those who participate or organise such assemblies are protected from state interference. Peaceful assembly includes meetings, mass actions, marches, sit down protests but not violent protest or direct action taken to prevent an activity at all.283 The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has interpreted the right as encompassing both the right not to be hindered by the state from assembling in order to pursue particular aims and a duty upon the state to ensure that such rights are secured even between individuals. For example, as stated in Ärzte fur das Leben, “genuine effective freedom of peaceful assembly cannot be reduced to a mere duty on the part of the State not to interfere.”284 Article 11 sometimes requires “positive measures to be taken even in the sphere of relations between individuals.”285 Lord Bingham echoed the decision in Ärzte in the domestic Laporte case where he held that a duty upon the state to “take reasonable and appropriate measures to enable lawful demonstrations to proceed peacefully”286 existed. Positive obligations to protect freedom of assembly and association are necessary for the full realisation of the right. For example, fear of violence from opponents resulting from a lack of protective state action is likely to deter demonstrations. Thus, fulfilment of Article 11 may require police action to mitigate risks of violence or facilitating protest via providing access to space. Also relevant is the freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10. In Appleby, the ECtHR held that where a bar on accessing property prevented the exercise of Article 10, e.g. there were no alternative means available, the court would not exclude the possibility of a positive obligation to protect Article 10 via regulating property rights.287 The UK, as a signatory of the ECHR, is bound by its articles and incorporates the Convention via the HRA 1998. Section 6 HRA makes it unlawful for any public authority to act in a manner incompliant with the ECHR.288 Public authorities include courts, tribunals, and “any person certain of 282 Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 283 HMCIC (n 2) 72. 284 Plattform ‘Ärzte für das Leben’ v Austria (1991) 13 EHRR 204 [32]. 285 ibid. 286 R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire [2006] UKHL 55 (Bingham LJ). 287 Mead, ‘The New Law of Peaceful Protest’ (n 1) 129, see Appleby and Others v. The United Kingdom - 44306/98 [2003] ECHR 222. 288 Human Rights Act 1998 s6.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212
Side 213
Side 214
Side 215
Side 216
Side 217
Side 218
Side 219
Side 220
Side 221
Side 222
Side 223
Side 224

x

Helga Law Journal

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Helga Law Journal
https://timarit.is/publication/1677

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.