Helga Law Journal

Ukioqatigiit
Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Qupperneq 176

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Qupperneq 176
Helga Law Journal Vol. 1, 2021 180 International Legal Research Group 181 ‘[The] role of the court is ‘to ensure that legitimate protest is not stigmatised as unlawful’ such that it will be ‘impossible for the claimants to succeed if their claim would amount to a disproportionate interference with freedom of expression including the expression of protest.’318 This is seen in the Edo case wherein a temporary injunction was granted, given that the protestors would have a quick trial.319 However, action by the firm in ignoring court orders prolonged the trial and ultimately led to the rejection of attempts to render the injunction permanent as they were held to have impeded a quick trial.320 Similarly, attempts by Novartis Pharmaceuticals to prohibit all masks, animal costumes, and banners containing words such as ‘abuses,’ or ‘torture,’ among other actions on its premises as they were “inciting criminal activity by subtle means” were rejected as they were a disproportionate interference with freedom of expression. 321 However, as Mead states, there is a tendency for case law to treat protests with disruptive aspects as non-peaceful, hence subject to PFHA injunctions.322 This equivocates peaceful protest involving minor obstructive elements with more disruptive direct action which arguably goes against the facilitative duty of public authorities and the approach of some degree of tolerance towards public disruption. The gradual limitation of defences exacerbates this, as the s1(3)(c) ‘reasonableness’ defence once considered to apply when vindicating Convention rights323 is now limited to only exceptional circumstances, e.g. rescuing someone from danger.324 Thus, it can be gathered that whilst the court does recognise its obligation to facilitate and give effect to Articles 10 and 11 as per its positive obligations under s6 HRA, in practice its rulings do appear to shift in favour of the private parties seeking injunctions. 6.5 Conclusion The UK, as an ECHR signatory, is bound by the positive obligations to facilitate and protect the rights of assembly and expression in order to ensure its citizens are able to voice their discontent through peaceful methods. The HRA bestows upon public authorities an obligation to act in a Convention compliant way, and as such the courts and the police have had to undertake various measures and balancing in order to give effect to the positive obligations required. Both bodies are empowered to make decisions regarding the extent to which private parties may impinge upon freedoms – either by maintaining the peace and ensuring the 318 Mead, ‘The New Law of Peaceful Protest’ (n 1) 272 citing EDO Technology (Preliminary Issues) [2005] EWHC 2490 [25] (Walker J). 319 Mills (n 43) 131. 320 ibid. 321 ibid 132. 322 Mead ‘A Chill’ (n 29) 106. 323 Mead, ‘The New Law of Peaceful Protest’ (n 1) 272. 324 ibid, DPP v Moseley, Selvanayagam and Woodling, unreported High Court decision, 9 June 1999. safety of protestors or by ensuring that protestors are able to protest in the locations and methods they prefer. However, the likelihood that in attempting to reach the balance between protestors and private rights and maintaining peaceful protest that the rights of protest may be impinged is ever present. 7 How equipped is your country's legal system to face the challenges presented by digital social movements such as #metoo, and how might the right to protest be exercised in this context? 7.1 Introduction In our current digital age, the internet is perhaps one of, if not the most powerful and effective tool of expression. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) have enabled mass and instantaneous exchanges, as well as disintermediation, all of which have successfully combated previous obstacles posed by time and geography. More crucially, the ability to send messages via digital means allow injustices and controversies, which may have gone unnoticed, to be conveyed to the rest of the world, without the burden of physicality. Blogging and other virtual tools of our generation, like weaving, are also art forms that deserve our respect. In many ways, social media can even be said to be a global tapestry of our times, worthy of legal protection because it is the unique junction where different threads come together: stories, opinions and protests. This essay believes that the complexity of cyberspace requires a more refined legal regime for the United Kingdom (UK) to effectively respond to the challenges, which stem from online expression and protest. The points which will be raised build upon the idea that a sound legal footing for the right to offline and online expression, is a necessary building block to support the right to protest in cyberspace. The first thread will explain how ambiguous parameters of acceptable speech, is inadequate to protect expression, particularly digital social movements and protests. Furthermore, despite established laws in regards to realspace speech, the regime governing online speech lacks transparency and consistency. A second thread will examine the existing regulation on physical protests and show that it is inapplicable in the context of cyberspace because of its unique architecture. Therefore, the final thread will tie together the first two, to show that a new legal regime that is specific to cyberspace is urgently needed in order to put an end to the enigmatic status quo, as well as to fairly govern the ever-evolving sphere of online expression and protest. Ultimately, these three threads, seek to persuade readers that the social media tapestry is a vital part of our lives and the right to add to it should be universal and upheld, particularly for those physically-disabled from voicing their suffering.
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184
Qupperneq 185
Qupperneq 186
Qupperneq 187
Qupperneq 188
Qupperneq 189
Qupperneq 190
Qupperneq 191
Qupperneq 192
Qupperneq 193
Qupperneq 194
Qupperneq 195
Qupperneq 196
Qupperneq 197
Qupperneq 198
Qupperneq 199
Qupperneq 200
Qupperneq 201
Qupperneq 202
Qupperneq 203
Qupperneq 204
Qupperneq 205
Qupperneq 206
Qupperneq 207
Qupperneq 208
Qupperneq 209
Qupperneq 210
Qupperneq 211
Qupperneq 212
Qupperneq 213
Qupperneq 214
Qupperneq 215
Qupperneq 216
Qupperneq 217
Qupperneq 218
Qupperneq 219
Qupperneq 220
Qupperneq 221
Qupperneq 222
Qupperneq 223
Qupperneq 224

x

Helga Law Journal

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Helga Law Journal
https://timarit.is/publication/1677

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.