Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði - 01.01.1994, Blaðsíða 26

24
Anna María Gunnarsdóttir...
Jörgen Pind. 1995a. Speaking rate, VOT and quantity: the search for higher-order
invariants for two Icelandic speech cues. Percepdon & Psychophysics, 57:291-
304.
Jörgen Pind. 1995b. Constancy and normalization in the perception of Voice Offset
Time as a cue for preaspiration. Acta Psychologica, 89:53-81.
Klatt Dennis H. 1980. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of
the Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 67:971-995.
Klatt Dennis H. og Laura C. Klatt. 1990. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice
quality among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 87:820-857.
Kuhl, P. K., K. A. Williams, F. Lacerda,K. N. StevensogB. Lindblom. 1992.Linguistic
experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science,
255:606-608.
Liberman, I. Y., D. Shankweiler, F. W. Fischer og B. Carter. 1974. Explicit syllable
and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 18:201—212.
Mehler, J. og E. Dupoux. 1994. What infants know: The new cognitive science ofearly
development. Blackwell, Oxford.
Morais, J., L. Cary, J. Alegria og P. Bertelson. 1979. Does awareness of speech as a
sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognidon, 7:323-331.
Nelson, Hazel E. 1980. Analysis of spelling errors in normal and dyslexic children.
Uta Frith (ritstj.): Cognitive Processesin Spelling, bls. 475^193. Academic Press,
London.
Read, C., Z. Yun-Fei, N. Hong-Yin og D. Bao-Qing. 1986. The ability to manipulate
speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24:31-44.
Steffens, Michele L., Rebecca E. Eilers, Karen Gross-Glenn, Bonnie Jallad. 1992.
Speech perception in adult subjects with familial dyslexia. Journal ofSpeech and
Hearing Research, 35:192-200.
Tallal, P. 1980. Auditory temporal perception, phonics and reading disabilities in
children. Brain and Language, 9:182-198.
Vellutino, Frank R. 1979. Dyslexia: Theory and Research. MIT Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
SUMMARY
This paper describes a study comparing speech perception in normal and spelling-
retarded students (average age 17 years). Though Icelandic spelling is usually consid-
ered reasonably regular, it has proven quite difficult to master for a number of Icelandic
students. The reasons for this have not been extensively investigated. It is clear that
Icelandic spelling makes demands on a number of diverse cognitive skills, some as-
pects of it are rule-govemed, others depend on rote memory, and no doubt other skills
as well are involved. It has been hypothesized by Baldur Sigurðsson and Steingrímur
Þórðarson (1987) that some errors are best explained as deficiences in speech percep-
tion, especially those errors related to the writing of single and double consonants in