Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Side 126

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Side 126
Helga Law Journal Vol. 1, 2021 130 131 If Icelandic students are not satisfied with certain things or situations, they will stand up and protest. The students of Reykjavík Junior College protested their poor financial contribution in 2013,88 the students and teachers of two junior colleges protested a proposed unification of the two schools89 and students of UI protested the proposed and controversial constructions of students housing on a square by the UI.90 To guarantee students participation in decision making, students receive two representatives in the University’s Council if number of students are over 5000 but if the number is under 5000, they’ll get one representative.91 The students have their own Students Council, SHÍ, which is a way for them to influence the University itself, improve the community and to ensure the students’ rights. All students of UI can vote and run for the Council. In the UI there are two active student body organizations, Röskva and Vaka. Their role is mainly to be a force that fights for students right. Since the University isn't restricting the right to protest, the students themselves are constantly finding ways to criticize the existing system and protest to any wrongdoings or discriminations that take place within the walls of UI. The main focus for the past years has relied mainly in various campaigns regarding specific issues92 and in establishing associations that fight for a better school and society.93 88 Stefán Árni Pálsson, ‘Á fimmta hundrað nemenda mótmæla fyrir utan menntamálaráðuneytið’ (Vísir, 25 November 2013) http://www.visir.is/g/2013131129456 accessed 22 June 2018. 89 Erla Björg Gunnarsdóttir, ‘Tæplega 800 mótmæla sameiningu FÁ við Tækniskóla: “Hrædd um að týnast í kerfinu”’ (Vísir, 12 May 2017) http://www.visir.is/g/2017170519498 accessed 22 June 2018. 90 Stefán Óli Jónsson, ‘”Með ólíkindum að stúdentar þurfi að standa í slag við háskólann”’ (Vísir, 2 November 2017) http://www.visir.is/g/2017171109802 accessed 22 June 2018. 91 Article 6 para 2 and 3 of the Public University Act no. 85/2008 (ICE). 92 For example the Equality Committee of UI protested the lack of accessibility for people that have to rely on wheelchairs by making a video series on social media where 93 For example the Feminist Association of UI and Q, the association for queer students of UI. abolished. There were both regular protests and many people who used the hash tag #höfumhátt on social media. The effect was so immense that it ended with the government to resign. This is an example of where traditional protest and social movements work together to put pressure on the people in charge. Even though digital social movements can be powerful weapons for people to secure their rights towards executive powers, there is also the challenge of protecting the right to privacy of individuals, which those movements can be directed towards. The right to protest can very well be exercised through digital mediums and is a good tool for individuals, as it is possible to share information faster and the state does not have the sources to stop these movements as it brings forward the danger of limiting freedom of expression too much. But regard must be taken to the right of all individuals and make sure that their right to privacy is also protected. 8 What role and responsibilities do academic institutions in your country have regarding promoting freedom of speech and the right to protest within and outside their campuses? There are seven universities in Iceland, of which three are private and four are public. The role of a university is to promote creation and communication of knowledge and skills to the students and to society as a whole.83 The role of junior colleges in Iceland is to promote full development of all students and guarantee their participation in a democratic society84 and the same applies for grade schools. Their role is to prepare the students for taking part in building up a society that’s constantly evolving.85 These objectives are also to be found in the curriculum that the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture publishes but their legal status is equivalent to a regulation. In that sense, and in the context of the question, the right of freedom of speech and protesting is something that has a clear connection to the school system in Iceland, even though there is nothing in the legislation that addresses the freedom to protest in a direct way.86 The discussion in Icelandic society, regarding freedom of speech and protests, is quite different from what can be seen in the United States, Australia and Europe. No anti-protest laws have been passed nor discussed in Iceland and the whole ‘safe space idea’ hasn’t quite reached to our academic institutions. In Iceland you’re free to protest, just as long you’re not interrupting public order or jeopardizing national security.87 83 Article 2 para 1 of the University Act no. 63/2006 (ICE). 84 Article 2 para 1 of the Junior Collage Act no. 92/2008 (ICE). 85 Article 2 para 1 of the Grade School Act no. 91/2008 (ICE). 86 In addition the University of Iceland is governed by regulation no. 569/2009 for the University. 87 Restriction to the right to protest is the subject of Question 5. International Legal Research Group
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193
Side 194
Side 195
Side 196
Side 197
Side 198
Side 199
Side 200
Side 201
Side 202
Side 203
Side 204
Side 205
Side 206
Side 207
Side 208
Side 209
Side 210
Side 211
Side 212
Side 213
Side 214
Side 215
Side 216
Side 217
Side 218
Side 219
Side 220
Side 221
Side 222
Side 223
Side 224

x

Helga Law Journal

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Helga Law Journal
https://timarit.is/publication/1677

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.