Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Page 171

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Page 171
Helga Law Journal Vol. 1, 2021 176 International Legal Research Group 177 whose functions are functions of a public nature.”289 Therefore, bodies such as the police, the courts, and local government are all required to fulfil the positive and negative obligations that Articles 10 and 11 entail. The ECHR only requires ‘reasonable and appropriate measures’ to safeguard the right,290 and derogations are permitted as neither right is absolute, thus the state can be seen to be under a general obligation of neutrality and to advocate a conciliatory stance.291 6.3 Policing and Positive Obligations Relating to Protest As a public authority, the police are required to act compatibly with the Convention and therefore are under a duty in certain circumstances to safeguard rights of assembly and expression. The police “must demonstrate a certain degree of tolerance towards the protest and anticipate a level of public disruption” in relation to non-violent demonstrations.292 Recent reports293 also indicate the adoption of a presumption in favour of facilitating peaceful protest as the standing point for policing protest. However, the police are also tasked with maintaining public order and safety and so must balance the safety and rights of the general public and the rights of the protestors.294 The police mainly seek to fulfil their facilitative role in three ways– police presence at demonstrations, co- operation prior to and during the assembly, and by using legislation to charge violent acts and to prohibit demonstrations that may lead to violence. 6.3.1 Police Presence at Demonstrations In Ärzte, the European Court recognised a facilitative duty by requiring that there is an adequate police presence in response to violent and disruptive opposition.295 Police presence, whilst sometimes leading to conflict with protestors, can be facilitative of protest as it deters violence and enables the demonstration to take place without interference from private individuals e.g. prevents violent counter- demonstrations. An example of this was the Bristol ‘Gays Against Sharia’ march which involved around 40 protestors but had a police presence involving more than 100 officers, 10 police riot vans, mounted officers and a law enforcement drone.296 289 ibid. 290 ‘Ärzte für das Leben’ (n 6). 291 Akandji-Kombe (n 3) 51. 292 HMCIC ‘Adapting to Protest’ (n 2) 4. 293 Committee on Human Rights, Facilitating Peaceful protest, 10th report of session 2010-11, Joint committee on Human Rights, HL paper 123, 25th March 2011, and also Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Adapting to Protest: Nurturing the British Model of Policing (2009). 294 HMCIC ‘Adapting to Protest’ (n 2) 5. 295 Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary, Adapting to Protest: Nurturing the British Model of Policing (2009) 61. 296Alex Ballinger, 'Massive Police Presence Keeps ‘Gays Against Sharia’ March and Counter-Protests Under Wraps' Bristol Post (2018) <https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/massive- police-presence-keeps-gays-1511608> accessed 12 July 2018.The march was organised by activists 6.3.2 Co-Operation Between the Police and Protestors In order to ensure that police involvement is proportionate to the size of the event, procedures have been implemented to increase co-operation between themselves and the organisers such that demonstrations can occur peacefully and that threats are mitigated. The organiser is required to notify the police of the date, time, route of the demonstration, along with the details of the organisers, six days in advance.297 This allows the police to determine the appropriate level of police presence and to manage any risks – for example the Public Order Act allows the police to impose conditions as to the route, location, duration and the number of people present if there is a reasonable belief that serious public disorder, damage to property or disruption to community life or the intimidation of others may occur.298 These conditions have the potential to prevent, instead of facilitating, the exercise of Article 10 and 11, and so require the Police to ensure that such conditions are proportionate to the risk that requires mitigating. The police have undertaken a ‘no surprises’ approach299 to policing protests with communication between organisers and the police before and during demonstrations, for example communicating via social media or tailored leaflets and ensuring that stewards are also used to ensure the protest remains peaceful.300 This ensures that police presence is both facilitative, as threats are managed, and appropriate to the demonstration. 6.3.3 Statutory Powers One fundamental aspect of the positive obligations of Articles 10 and 11 is to protect those exercising such rights from violence from private individuals. Thus, the police have multiple statutory and common law powers to address such situations. If a chief officer reasonably believes that imposing conditions are not sufficient to prevent serious public disorder, they can apply to the local council or Secretary of State for an an order prohibiting the holding of public processions or a particular class of public procession in the area or part of the area for a period of up to 3 months.301 Alongside the more traditional and well-known criminal law offences e.g. assault and battery, the Public Order Act 1986 defines a number of statutory offences, including riot, violent disorder, affray, causing fear or provocation of violence and causing harassment, alarm and distress which can be utilised against those being violent and threatening other’s exercise of expression and assembly. Common law powers regarding breaches of the peace also exist; there is a duty to seek to prevent by arrest or any action short of, any with links to the far right and faced counter protests from anti-fascist and LGBT+ groups. The two groups were kept at a distance by the police to prevent clashes. 297 ibid. 298 ibid ss.12 and 14. 299 HMCIC ‘Nurturing the British Model’ (n 17) 36. 300 Joint Committee on Human Rights, Facilitating Peaceful protest, 10th report of session 2010-11, Joint committee on Human Rights, HL paper 123, 25th March 2011. 301 n 21 s 13(1).
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224

x

Helga Law Journal

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Helga Law Journal
https://timarit.is/publication/1677

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.