Helga Law Journal

Ukioqatigiit
Ataaseq assigiiaat ilaat

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Qupperneq 215

Helga Law Journal - 01.01.2021, Qupperneq 215
Helga Law Journal Vol. 1, 2021 220 International Legal Research Group 221 The prefects could restrain person from protest during the labour Law. The Constitution Council decided that the measure was not proportionate and violates constitutional rights. Article 8§3, which forbade the residence of any person seeking to obstruct the public authorities actions, was also censored but the legislator manages to make it more flexible it including the condition of a “serious reason to think that the person can represent a threat to the security and the public order”. In conclusion, France applied Article 15 of the ECHR in the context of the state of emergency between November 13, 2015, and November 1st, 2017. During that period, administrative police used its extended power to ban protests in order to preserve peace and public order. The use of theses powers raised questions surrounding the legitimacy of the protests’ prohibitions. In fact, the authorities used the derogation of Article 15 not only to prevent France from a “public emergency” but also to avoid any public disturbance. 5 What positive obligations does your State assume to guarantee the enjoyment of the right to protest and to protect against the interference of private parties? Article 431-1 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code provides that "the act of hindering, in a concerted manner and with the help of threats, the exercise of freedom of expression, of work, of association rally participants in a territorial assembly or territorial event is punished by imprisonment and a fine of € 15,000."38 Thus, the right to demonstrate is a right recognized and regulated by the penal code. The article L211-4 of the code of the internal security39 decree-law of 1935 states that "the authority invested with police powers considers that the planned demonstration is likely to disturb public order, it is prohibited by a duly motivated decision to avoid a cancellation by an administrative jurisdiction." To make a prohibition order, two conditions must therefore be met: A real danger of serious disturbances and the absence of another effective means of maintaining public order Any prohibition order must be immediately notified by a judicial police officer to the signatories of the declaration. The latter must, unless refused, signed a Notification Process. If this notification is impossible, advertising must be done by any means. If this prohibition is pronounced by the mayor, the prohibition order is transmitted within 24 hours to the Police Commissioner. If the considers that this prohibition is not justified, he may appeal to the Administrative Tribunal to have the order annulled. Conversely, a Police Commissioner can replace the mayor who has not issued a prohibition order if he considers that the event is likely 38 Penal Code, Article 431-1 para 1. 39 Internal Security Code, Article L211-4. to disturb public order. Because the freedom to demonstrate responds to a system of prior declaration, the judge exercises maximum control of administrative decisions in this area, that is to say, a control that meets the standards of the case law Benjamin (EC May 19, 1933). For example, the ban on the Tibetan community in France on the occasion of a visit by the President of the People's Republic of China was cancelled on the double ground that the possible violation of "international relations of the Republic "is foreign to considerations of public order on the one hand, and that a general prohibition order exceeded, on the other hand, what was required by the maintenance of order (EC Nov. 12). 1997, No. 169295). The fact remains that the cancellation in 1997 of a protest order issued in 1994 has little effect on the effectiveness of the rights of those concerned. From this point of view, the introduction of the interim release by the Act of June 30, 2000, here as elsewhere, changed the situation: freedom of demonstration, fundamental freedom within the meaning of Article L. 521-2 CJA ( CE, ord., Jan. 5, 2007, Min of the interior c / Assoc "Solidarity of the French", n ° 300311), can from now on be usefully protected, whenever the administrative judge is demanding with regard to the administrative authority, and exercises a genuine control of the proportionality between general and absolute measure (the prohibition) and the reality of the disturbances which it is a question of avoiding and containing. In another case, a Police Commissioner had banned a demonstration of police officers by an order under the pretext that it constituted by "its very existence" a disturbance of public order. This was an error of law. Indeed, such a conception would have led to the deprivation of the right to peaceful demonstration of entire sections of the public service: police, but also magistrates, high officials, etc. It was based on a misinterpretation of Article 29 of the Decree of 9 May 1995 which only prohibits acts or remarks of "nature to bring disrepute to the body to which it belongs or to disturb public order". A peaceful protest, by itself, does not disturb public order. If police officers are deprived of the right to strike and are subject to a duty of discretion and discretion, they enjoy the freedom of demonstration on the public road guaranteed by the decree of October 23, 1935 (under the condition of having done the subject of a prior declaration to the competent authority, which can only prohibit it on the grounds of a threat to public order). In the end, the Toulouse Administrative Court stated, explicitly, that there is no incompatibility in principle between the special reserve obligation imposed on certain officials and the exercise of the freedom to demonstrate. In the private sector, an employer cannot prevent his employee from going to a protest. This is an individual freedom guaranteed by law. The employer can neither sanction nor discriminate, in terms of advancement for example, an employee on strike. However, the latter will not be paid during his absence, unless the strike results from a serious and deliberate breach by the employer of his obligations, or if an agreement to terminate the strike has provided for it.
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173
Qupperneq 174
Qupperneq 175
Qupperneq 176
Qupperneq 177
Qupperneq 178
Qupperneq 179
Qupperneq 180
Qupperneq 181
Qupperneq 182
Qupperneq 183
Qupperneq 184
Qupperneq 185
Qupperneq 186
Qupperneq 187
Qupperneq 188
Qupperneq 189
Qupperneq 190
Qupperneq 191
Qupperneq 192
Qupperneq 193
Qupperneq 194
Qupperneq 195
Qupperneq 196
Qupperneq 197
Qupperneq 198
Qupperneq 199
Qupperneq 200
Qupperneq 201
Qupperneq 202
Qupperneq 203
Qupperneq 204
Qupperneq 205
Qupperneq 206
Qupperneq 207
Qupperneq 208
Qupperneq 209
Qupperneq 210
Qupperneq 211
Qupperneq 212
Qupperneq 213
Qupperneq 214
Qupperneq 215
Qupperneq 216
Qupperneq 217
Qupperneq 218
Qupperneq 219
Qupperneq 220
Qupperneq 221
Qupperneq 222
Qupperneq 223
Qupperneq 224

x

Helga Law Journal

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Helga Law Journal
https://timarit.is/publication/1677

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.