Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 05.01.2015, Qupperneq 10

Læknablaðið : fylgirit - 05.01.2015, Qupperneq 10
X V I I V Í S I N D A R Á Ð S T E F N A H Í F Y L G I R I T 8 2 10 LÆKNAblaðið/Fylgirit 82 2015/101 E 4 Heilsueflandi heimsóknir til 80 ára einstaklinga á þjónustusvæði heilsugæslustöðvarinnar á Selfossi Steinunn Birna Svavarsdóttir1, Árún K. Sigurðardóttir2, Sólveig Ása Árnadóttir3 1Heilsugæslustöðinni á Selfossi, 2Heilbrigðisvísindasviði Háskólans á Akureyri, 3námsbraut í sjúkraþjálfun, læknadeild Háskóla Íslands steinunn@hsu.is Inngangur: Stjórnvöld horfa í vaxandi mæli til heilsueflandi heimsókna til að ýta undir heilbrigða öldrun og að viðhalda sjálfstæði aldraðra á eigin heimili. Lítið hefur þó borið á rannsóknum á þessari þjónustu. Tilgangurinn var að rannsaka einkenni og afdrif tveggja hópa aldraðra einstaklinga sem ýmist þáðu eða afþökkuðu heilsueflandi heimsókn. Efniviður og aðferðir: Megindleg samanburðarferilrannsókn var notuð til að rýna í fyrirliggjandi gögn í Sögukerfinu. Gögnin byggðu á upp- lýsingum um 148 áttræða einstaklinga sem fengu boð um eina heilsu- eflandi heimsókn frá heilsugæslustöðinni á Selfossi á árunum 2005-2010. Niðurstöður: Alls þáðu 100 (68%) heilsueflandi heimsókn (51 karl og 49 konur) en 48 (32%) afþökkuðu (17 karlar og 31 kona). Við upphaf rann- sóknartímabilsins reyndist marktækur munur á svefnlyfjanotkun eftir hópum (p=0,011). Þeir sem þáðu heimsókn notuðu frekar svefnlyf (44%) en þeir sem afþökkuðu (21%). Þrátt fyrir fáa þátttakendur, eina heilsu- eflandi heimsókn og stutta eftirfylgd voru marktæk tengsl á milli þess að hafa þegið heimsóknina og að vera á lífi einu (p=0,014) og tveimur (p=0,006) árum eftir hana. Meðal þess sem einkenndi hópinn sem þáði heilsueflandi heimsókn var að konur bjuggu frekar einar en karlar, rúmlega helmingur hópsins stundaði enga reglulega hreyfingu og 71% var yfir kjörþyngd. Gagnagöt (missing data) í gagnagrunni takmörkuðu möguleika á úrvinnslu. Ályktanir: Til að meta þörf fyrir forvarnir og heilsueflingu, sem og árangur heilsueflandi heimsókna, er brýnt að bæta skráningu og efla notkun staðlaðra matskvarða. Rannsaka þarf orsök þess hvað fær fólk til að þiggja heilsueflandi heimsókn og þróa þarf þetta þjónustuúrræði áfram. Æskilegt er að samræma heilsueflandi heimsóknir á landsvísu þannig að safna megi gögnum og nýta til að meta langtímaárangur fyrir stærri hópa eldra fólks. E 5 Guidelines and tests for antenatal care in normal pregnancies: Evaluation of clinical guidelines in Europe Helga Gottfreðsdóttir1,2, Lucy Frith3, Katrien Beekman4, Annette Bernloehr5 1Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, 2Landspítala, 3The University of Liverpool, Department of Health Services Research, 4 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, 5Midwifery Research and Education Unit Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School helgagot@hi.is Introduction: Clinical guidelines for low risk pregnancies have been developed and implemented in many European countries. The aim is to provide an overview of excisting antenatal care guidelines (ANC) on a national basis for healthy women in Europe. Methods and data: A questionnaire was developed and pretested in 18 countries with help from experts in maternity care in each country. The content of the guidelines was explored with emphasis on 5 specific components; fetal screening, blood pressure measurement, ultrasound scans, blood samples and number of visits. Results: 12/18 countries have ANC implemented on a national basis, but two countries have regional guidelines, as such 14 questionnaires were analyzed. 11/12 ANC incorporated description of Down syndrome screening, where 9/12 emphasized first trimester screening. The total number of blood samples advised in normal pregnancy varied from 2 to 8, and advised number of visits were reccomended 5-15 for a primigra- vida and 4-15 for multipara. Conclusions: There are indications of a wide rangeof content in ANC in Europe. If ANC are meant to change clinical practice, they must be app- ropriately developed, disseminated, and implemented. Data has been collected from 30 countries which are being analyzed. E 6 Associations between meal frequency and glycemic properties of maternal diet and preterm delivery Linda Englund-Ögge1, Bryndís Eva Birgisdóttir2,3, Anne Lise Brantsæter2, Verena Sengpiel1, Margareta Haugen2, Ronny Myhre4, Helle Margrete Meltzer2, Bo Jacobsson1, 4 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 2Department of Exposure and Risk Assessment, Division of Environmental Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 3Unit for Nutrition Research, Landspítali University Hospital and University of Iceland, 4Department of Genes and Environment, Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health beb@hi.is Introduction: The objective of this study was to examine associations between meal frequency and glycemic properties of maternal diet and preterm delivery. Methods and data: A nation wide prospective cohort study including 66,000 singleton pregnancies from the Norwegian Mother and Child cohort study. Information about mothers’ meal frequency and maternal diet was obtained from a validated self-reported food frequency ques- tionnaire answered in mid-pregnancy. Information on gestational age at delivery was obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and preterm delivery was defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation. Results: After adjustments there was a trend towards lower risk for preterm delivery when following a “main meal pattern”, which included eating breakfast, lunch and dinner regularly, p = 0.025. After additional adjustments for meal frequency and dietary fiber none of the glycemicproperty measures was significantly associated with overall risk of preterm delivery. However, glycemic load was associated with late preterm delivery in the whole group, with a hazard ratio for the highest vs lowest quartile of 1.25 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.56). A high intake of dietary fibers was associated with a significantly reduced risk of preterm delivery in younger women (age <= 35 years) with hazard ratio for the highest vs lowest quartile of 0.85 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). Conclusions: Thesignificant associationof meal frequency and various measures of glycemic properties with different subgroups of thestudy populationand for different subgroups of preterm deliveryindicate the importance of maternal diet for infant health and needs further inve- stigation to be fully understood. E 7 Útkoma heimafæðinga og sjúkrahúsfæðinga á Íslandi 2005- 2009: Afturskyggn ferilrannsókn Berglind Hálfdánsdóttir1, Alexander Kr. Smárason2,3, Ólöf Ásta Ólafsdóttir1, Ingegerd Hildingsson4,5,6, Herdís Sveinsdóttir1,7 1Hjúkrunarfræðideild Háskóla Íslands, 2heilbrigðisvísindasviði Háskólans á Akureyri, 3fæðinga- og kvensjúkdómalækningum, Sjúkrahúsinu á Akureyri, 4Department of Nursing, Mid Sweden University, 5Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, 6Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, 7skurðlækningasviði Landspítala beh6@hi.is Inngangur: Tíðni heimafæðinga á Íslandi var 2,2% árið 2012. Tíðnin er sú hæsta á Norðurlöndunum og hefur aukist hratt á síðustu árum í kjölfar sögulegrar lægðar í lok síðustu aldar. Útkoma heimafæðinga á
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160
Qupperneq 161
Qupperneq 162
Qupperneq 163
Qupperneq 164
Qupperneq 165
Qupperneq 166
Qupperneq 167
Qupperneq 168
Qupperneq 169
Qupperneq 170
Qupperneq 171
Qupperneq 172
Qupperneq 173

x

Læknablaðið : fylgirit

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Læknablaðið : fylgirit
https://timarit.is/publication/991

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.