Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Årgang

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.2004, Side 106

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.2004, Side 106
Steindór Steindórsson (1950) Akuryrkja á Íslandi í fornöld og fyrr á öldum. Prentverk Odds Björnssonar h/f,Akureyri. Sunnlenskar byggðir VI Skaftárþing (1985) Hvammshreppur. Búnaðarsamband Suðurlands. Þorleifur Einarsson (1961) Pollenanalytische Untersuchungen zur spät- und postglazialen Klimageschichte Islands. Sonder veröffentlichungen des Geologischen Institutes der Universität Köln 6. Summary There is convincing evidence that arable agriculture was a part of the subsistence economy of the first settlers in Iceland; and it is generally accepted that cultivation of barley, believed to have been the only cereal crop grown, was practised from very early on until it stopped, due to deteriorating climatic conditions, in the 14th century. The evidence for barley cultivation derives from four main sources: 1. written sources: a. the Sagas; b. contemporary texts: Sturlunga, cartularies, deeds; 2. place names; 3. the palynological record (Hordeum type pollen); 4. the archaeological record (e.g. plant macro remains). We lack, however, knowledge of many aspects of early barley cultivation in Iceland. It is, for example, not clear, given the country´s geographical location and its climatic condition, how reliable a food source locally grown barley was and thus how large a component of the subsistence economy it was. Our knowledge of the intensity of this cultivation through the almost six centuries it is believed to have lasted is also limited. In 1999 a research project was started which had two main aims: firstly, to shed light on arable activities in the early agricultural history of Iceland by investigating four alleged ancient barley fields in the south and south-west of the country, to date them and establish if barley had indeed been grown in those fields. Secondly, the aim was to test a set of research methods for archaeological investigation.The research design involved an archaeological investigation, remote sensing and aerial photography, tephrochronological dating, palynological and micromorphological investigation and soil chemical analysis. The CENTURY agro-ecosystem model was used to examine turnover of key soil macronutrients in relation to the potential grain yields of landrace barley for the fields examined. Alleged barley fields in Iceland broadly fall into two categories based on morpho- logical features and their setting in the landscape. On the one hand there are fields located on flatland and on the other hand there are fields on south-facing, often terraced slopes. It was decided to investigate two alleged fields from each category. A prerequisite for site selection was that there were visible surface features present and that a source, either a place name, written records, e.g. cartularies, or oral tradition, indicated an arable field. The sites selected, all located in the south and south-west of Iceland, were the following:Akurey (akur meaning arable field), an island near Reykjavik, and a home field at the farm Hólavellir representing the flatland category on the one hand and home fields at the farms Ketilsstaðir and Fagridalur representing the fields located on south facing slopes on the other. Each site was surveyed and accurate contour models built from Differential GPS measurements and aerial photographs in order to register surface features that could be used to identify similar sites.Trial trenches were excavated at each site to study soil and tephra layers and to facilitate sampling of soils for palynological, micromorphological and chemical analyses. FORNIR AKRAR Á ÍSLANDI 105
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180
Side 181
Side 182
Side 183
Side 184
Side 185
Side 186
Side 187
Side 188
Side 189
Side 190
Side 191
Side 192
Side 193

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.