Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 109

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 109
107 Are national Curriculum objectives for teaching English being met in icelandic compulsory schools? Samúel Lefever Háskóli Íslands, Menntavísindasvið (University of Iceland, School of Education) This article looks at recent research on English language teaching at the compulsory level in Iceland with regard to National Curriculum objectives. Three main issues are discussed: types of teaching methods used, the use of English during instruction, and the types of assessment methods used. The National Curriculum for foreign languages follows the principles of communicative language teaching and emphasizes the teaching of all four skills (reading, listening, writing and speaking) and integrating grammar and vocabulary with skills-based instruction. Teachers are encouraged to use a variety of techniques, activities, and materials that take into account diverse learning needs, use English as much as possible during instruction, and assist students in becoming autonomous learners through goal-setting and self-assessment. Assessment should be constructive, informative and include a variety of methods. Formal assessment (written tests) is not considered appropriate for learners in grades 1-5. An analysis of studies of English teaching at the compulsory level shows a discrepancy between communicative teaching methods recommended by the National Curriculum and those used in English instruction. Traditional methods of teaching and assessment are predominately used in schools. On the whole, instruction is teacher-directed and text-book bound and innovative approaches towards more holistic, learner-centered teaching do not seem to have gained ground. Teachers are not fulfilling their role of using English for classroom interaction and communication, and students are not provided with ample opportunities for authentic and creative use of English. Finally, traditional assessment methods based on written tests are used by most teachers, particularly in the upper grades, and little progress has been made in introducing alternative assessment methods recommended by the National Curriculum. Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009, 107–128 Hagnýtt gildi: Í greininni eru teknar saman niðurstöður íslenskra rannsókna á enskukennslu á grunnskólastigi. Fjallað er um kennsluhætti og námsmat með hliðsjón af nýjum straumum í tungumálakennslu og markmiðum Aðalnámskrár grunnskóla. Greinin veitir innsýn í stöðu enskukennslunnar og nýtist sem innlegg í umræður um stefnumótun í enskukennslu og eftirfylgni með kennslu á grunnskólastigi. During the last twenty years the use of English throughout the world has increased both in magnitude and nature. It now has a special role in many countries and has emerged as perhaps the world’s first truly global language (Crystal, 2004; Graddol, 2006; McKay, 2002). The number of non-native speakers of English has rapidly expanded and millions of individuals are learning English as an additional language. Over 100 countries now prioritize English as the chief foreign language to be taught in schools (Crystal, 2004). The growing importance of English can also been seen in Iceland. There is abundant
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.