Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 115

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 115
113 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009 Breytingar á uppeldissýn í leikskóla and approaches to be used at the compulsory level. The curriculum guide recommends the use of a variety of techniques, activities, and materials that challenge and appeal to pupils, strengthen their self-confidence and take into account diverse learning needs. Some examples of teaching techniques and activities that are recommended in the curriculum guide are the use of songs, games, role play, themes and project work. Teachers are encouraged to use individual, pair and group work, integrate English teaching with other subjects and use information and computer technology in their teaching. As children progress in their English learning, teachers are expected to increase their use of English in the classroom. The curriculum guide states that English should be used during instruction to a large extent in grades 7 and 8 and exclusively in grades 9 and 10. Training in the use of learning strategies, independent work habits, and cooperative learning are considered important factors of language learning. Emphasis is also put on assisting pupils in becoming autonomous learners through goal-setting, self-assessment, and the use of learning aids such as dictionaries and correction tools. Finally, importance is placed on active and creative language use and establishing and maintaining positive attitudes towards the learning of English (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 2007). The objectives and recommendations of the National Curriculum call for lessons that focus on individual learner needs and abilities. Hafdís Ingvarsdóttir (2007) views this move towards a more personalized approach as a paradigm shift in language pedagogy, a shift which gives more attention to individual differences and social factors affecting language acquisition. The goal of learner autonomy or getting learners to accept responsibility for their own learning implies a change from teacher- directed instruction to that of learner-centered, self-directed learning (Ingvarsdóttir, 2007; Little, 1999, 2003). It also calls for changes in language assessment which recognize the importance of an integrated link between teaching and assessment and the role of self- assessment in learning. The following sections of the article look at recent studies of English teaching in Icelandic schools. The discussion will focus on three main themes: teaching methods, use of English in the classroom and assessment methods, and how classroom practices in regard to the themes differ according to age levels. The findings of the studies will also be examined in reference to the National Curriculum objectives for English teaching at the compulsory level in Iceland. English teaching methods The body of research into language teaching and classroom practices in Icelandic schools is small but growing. Although more classroom- based research is needed to provide a more complete picture, recent studies shed light on the current situation regarding English language instruction at the primary and lower secondary school levels. A comprehensive evaluation of English language teaching at the compulsory school level, commissioned by the Ministry of Education, was carried out in 2005-2006. Eight schools representing a cross-section of school sizes and rural and urban areas participated in the evaluation. Data was obtained from a number of sources such as school curricula and syllabi, school assessments, teacher and pupil questionnaires, interviews with teachers, and classroom observations (Lovísa Kristjánsdóttir, Laufey Bjarnadóttir & Samúel Lefever, 2006). Written questionnaires were given to pupils in grades 5, 9 & 10 (aged 10-16) and their English teachers. The questionnaires surveyed the pupils’ and teachers’ attitudes towards the teaching and learning methods and materials used in English instruction. Approximately 800 pupils and 23 teachers participated in the survey. One of the objectives of the questionnaires was to gather information about teaching methods used in English instruction and
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.