Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 123

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 123
121 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009 Breytingar á uppeldissýn í leikskóla steady and frequent, focus on listening and speaking in English, and gradually begin to include reading comprehension and spelling. Pupils should receive informative and positive feedback (written and/or oral) about their progress in the various English skill areas. Self-assessment should be a part of overall assessment along with teacher assessment (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 2007). The majority of the surveyed teachers in grades 1-4 did not use formal assessment; instead they reported using on-going assessment or portfolios (Lefever, 2007). Many of them based their assessment on the children’s participation and their work over the course of the winter. Some teachers gave written comments on pupils’ report cards rather than letter or number grades. However, a few teachers said they used written tests, e.g. end of term tests, to assess the children’s learning. On the other hand, the findings from the teacher survey in grades 5-7 showed that a large majority of the teachers (85%) used written tests to assess the pupils (Lefever, 2008a). Fewer than half of the teachers reported using a combination of continuous assessment and oral tests or activities. Once again, few teachers said they used portfolio or self-assessment (12.5%). Thus, assessment practices at the primary level, as with the lower secondary level, seemed to fall short of the National Curriculum recommendations, since formal written tests were widely used in grades 5-7 and even in a few cases in the lower grades. Just as serious is the hesitancy of teachers to implement more learner-centered and performance-based methods such as portfolio assessment and self-assessment. Traditional written tests are deemed unsatisfactory for a number of reasons. One of their largest shortcomings is that they do not include all skill areas such as the oral skills of spoken interaction and production. It is also difficult to assess creative writing, authentic- like English use, and integrated language use in a written test format. Written tests generally consist of discrete items which test grammar and vocabulary out of context or reading comprehension and content area knowledge with questions that are far removed from real- life interaction. Perhaps most importantly, written tests rarely focus on what students can actually do in the language, and most students do not see them as positive and motivating (Alderson, 2002; Auður Torfadóttir, 2005; Bachman & Palmer, 1996; McKay, 2002; O’Malley & Valdez Pierce, 1996). Therefore, the overreliance on traditional assessment methods and the failure to introduce holistic, learner-centered methods such as portfolio and self-assessment are serious flaws in English instruction at the compulsory school level. Discussion The findings of the Icelandic studies that look at English teaching methods in compulsory schools draw attention to a disparity between communicative teaching methods recommended by the National Curriculum Guide and those used in English instruction. In grades 1-4, a wide range of teaching methods were found and teaching practices were generally in line with the curriculum objectives for that level. The majority of teachers put emphasis on using songs and games in lessons and introducing new vocabulary to learners. Most teachers used conventional whole group instruction and informal assessment methods for this age group. Although teachers attempted to use English in the classroom, more than half of them said they used it less than half the time during lessons. In grades 5-10, the results of the studies indicate that teachers tended to emphasize traditional, text book-bound, teacher-directed methods that primarily focused on listening and reading in English, workbook use, and grammar exercises. Much less emphasis seems to be put on communicative activities. These results are similar to those found in a survey of 30 English teachers in Japan which showed that teachers used most of the teaching time for grammar instruction, vocabulary work and reading aloud (Sakui, 2004). Although the
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.