Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Volume

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1967, Page 66

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags - 01.01.1967, Page 66
70 ÁRBÓK FORNLEIFAFÉLAGSINS SUMMARY The starting-point of the present paper is an article vvritten by the well known Danish scholar Japetus Steenstrup and published in Aarboger for nordisk Oldkynd- ighed og Historie 1871. In his paper Steenstrup discusses the natural phenomenon called hafgeröingar, sometimes referred to in medieval Icelandic sources and de- scribed at some length in the Norwegian King’s Mirror (Konungsskuggsjá, Speculum Regale). Steenstrup tried to show that the hafgeröingar very probably were due to submarine earthquake and he brought together a good inany accounts from his own times in order to throw light upon the phenomenon described in the King’s Mirror. Moreover he thought that the description in the King's Mirror was based on one certain hafgeröingar, namely the one which caused the Hafgerð- ingadrápa to be composed by a Hebridean on board Herjúlfur Bjarnason’s boat heading for Greenland in the year 986, as related in the Grænlendinga saga in the Flateyjarbók. Steenstrup also believed that the hafgeröingar which gave rise to the Hafgerðingadrápa, also was the cause of the disaster, which struck the fleet of Erik the Red and his followers on their way to Greenland in the same year. The present author finds that the two last of Steenstrup’s points really are pure guesswork, but he admits that hafgeröingar as described in the King’s Mirror could have been caused by earthquake on the bottom of the sea. The true aim of the article, however, is to show that the term liafgeröingar in the old Icelandic and Norwegian sources was used in a wider sense than assumed by Steenstrup. In thc author’s opinion any sudden and violent turbulence of the sea might have been called hafgeröingar, no matter which natural forces caused it. In order to prove his point he quotes a séries of accounts from the experience of Icelandic sailors and fishermen in later times. Some of the phenomena described in these accounts of eyewitnesses could, in the author’s opinion, serve as illustrations to the hafgerö- ingar of the King’s Mirror and other medieval writings.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140

x

Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Árbók Hins íslenzka fornleifafélags
https://timarit.is/publication/97

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.