Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 117

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 117
115 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009 Breytingar á uppeldissýn í leikskóla drills. Considerable classroom time was used for checking homework, sometimes by showing answers on an overhead transparency. English use in the classrooms varied greatly. In a few cases the teacher used English extensively but more commonly little English was used for communicative interaction between teacher and pupils. Oral discussions in English were not common and pupils rarely used English during group work. In some classrooms pupils answered the teacher’s questions in English. Another survey of English teaching practices was conducted by Helga Sigurjónsdóttir in 2006 as part of her B.Ed. thesis. A representative sample of grade 10 English teachers completed a questionnaire about their English teaching. Twenty-seven teachers participated in the survey, which gave a response rate of 75% (Helga Sigurjónsdóttir, 2006). The teachers were asked to indicate the skill areas they emphasized most in their teaching. The skills most frequently mentioned were reading comprehension, vocabulary, writing and listening comprehension - the same skills that are tested on the school-leaving exam (samræmd lokapróf). Only 10% of the teachers gave speaking and communicative activities the highest ranking in terms of emphasis, even though the National Curriculum clearly stresses the importance of oral skills. In the same survey over half of the teachers said they emphasized the teaching of grammar and many of the teachers said they assigned grammar activities for homework. The findings of this survey indicate that traditional workbook use including grammar and vocabulary activities received more teaching time than communicative activities. A few studies have been conducted that give insight into English teaching at the primary level. In a survey done in 2002, Auður Torfadóttir investigated how the curriculum changes introduced in the 1999 National Curriculum had been implemented. With the adoption of the 1999 National Curriculum the beginning level of English teaching was lowered from grade 7 to grade 5. Auður surveyed 75% of the teachers who taught English in grade 5 during the year 2001-2002. The findings showed that teachers placed most emphasis on the areas of speaking and listening, followed by vocabulary and reading. The most commonly used teaching methods and activities were songs, games, workbook use and pair work. Least emphasis was given to role play and theme work (Auður Torfadóttir, 2003). Although teachers used songs and games with the pupils, the difference between the amount of workbook work and activities that allow for more creative language use was noticeable and illustrated the teachers’ reliance on traditional teaching methods. Teachers in the survey also seemed to place importance on direct grammar teaching since many of them criticized the teaching materials for a lack of grammar exercises. However, the National Curriculum recommended that beginning English learners at this age learn grammar indirectly and that grammar instruction be integrated with the learning of the other skills (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999). Similar results regarding English teaching for beginners were found in the 2006 evaluation discussed above (Lovísa Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2006). The grade 5 teachers said it was most important to teach speaking, listening and vocabulary in English. Half of the teachers said direct grammar instruction was important at this level. Almost all of the teachers placed emphasis on workbook use, pair work and having pupils read aloud. Many teachers emphasized using songs and games but role play, computer activities and using video materials received the least emphasis. The most recent study of teaching methods in the upper grades of primary school (grades 5-7) was carried out in 2007 (Lefever, 2008a). The study sample consisted of 30% of the nation’s primary schools from all geographical areas. Teachers answered a questionnaire about their background and education, teaching methods and areas of emphasis, use of teaching materials, target language use, and assessment methods.
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.