Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Page 117

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Page 117
115 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009 Breytingar á uppeldissýn í leikskóla drills. Considerable classroom time was used for checking homework, sometimes by showing answers on an overhead transparency. English use in the classrooms varied greatly. In a few cases the teacher used English extensively but more commonly little English was used for communicative interaction between teacher and pupils. Oral discussions in English were not common and pupils rarely used English during group work. In some classrooms pupils answered the teacher’s questions in English. Another survey of English teaching practices was conducted by Helga Sigurjónsdóttir in 2006 as part of her B.Ed. thesis. A representative sample of grade 10 English teachers completed a questionnaire about their English teaching. Twenty-seven teachers participated in the survey, which gave a response rate of 75% (Helga Sigurjónsdóttir, 2006). The teachers were asked to indicate the skill areas they emphasized most in their teaching. The skills most frequently mentioned were reading comprehension, vocabulary, writing and listening comprehension - the same skills that are tested on the school-leaving exam (samræmd lokapróf). Only 10% of the teachers gave speaking and communicative activities the highest ranking in terms of emphasis, even though the National Curriculum clearly stresses the importance of oral skills. In the same survey over half of the teachers said they emphasized the teaching of grammar and many of the teachers said they assigned grammar activities for homework. The findings of this survey indicate that traditional workbook use including grammar and vocabulary activities received more teaching time than communicative activities. A few studies have been conducted that give insight into English teaching at the primary level. In a survey done in 2002, Auður Torfadóttir investigated how the curriculum changes introduced in the 1999 National Curriculum had been implemented. With the adoption of the 1999 National Curriculum the beginning level of English teaching was lowered from grade 7 to grade 5. Auður surveyed 75% of the teachers who taught English in grade 5 during the year 2001-2002. The findings showed that teachers placed most emphasis on the areas of speaking and listening, followed by vocabulary and reading. The most commonly used teaching methods and activities were songs, games, workbook use and pair work. Least emphasis was given to role play and theme work (Auður Torfadóttir, 2003). Although teachers used songs and games with the pupils, the difference between the amount of workbook work and activities that allow for more creative language use was noticeable and illustrated the teachers’ reliance on traditional teaching methods. Teachers in the survey also seemed to place importance on direct grammar teaching since many of them criticized the teaching materials for a lack of grammar exercises. However, the National Curriculum recommended that beginning English learners at this age learn grammar indirectly and that grammar instruction be integrated with the learning of the other skills (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999). Similar results regarding English teaching for beginners were found in the 2006 evaluation discussed above (Lovísa Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2006). The grade 5 teachers said it was most important to teach speaking, listening and vocabulary in English. Half of the teachers said direct grammar instruction was important at this level. Almost all of the teachers placed emphasis on workbook use, pair work and having pupils read aloud. Many teachers emphasized using songs and games but role play, computer activities and using video materials received the least emphasis. The most recent study of teaching methods in the upper grades of primary school (grades 5-7) was carried out in 2007 (Lefever, 2008a). The study sample consisted of 30% of the nation’s primary schools from all geographical areas. Teachers answered a questionnaire about their background and education, teaching methods and areas of emphasis, use of teaching materials, target language use, and assessment methods.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.