Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 104

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Side 104
102 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009 rannsókninni má ætla að starfskenning hvers og eins fimmmenninganna hafi ráðið meiru um notkun UST og þar með sýn hvers og eins þeirra á hana, en sérstaða greinarinnar og sú menning eða hefð sem henni fylgir (sbr. subject-specific practice). Af þessu leiðir að þau markmið sem falla undir „vinnubrögð og færni“ og „hlutverk og eðli náttúruvísinda“ samkvæmt náttúrufræðinámskránni 1999 virtust veik og óljós í kennsluháttum kennaranna fimm. Rannsóknir á notkun UST í náttúruvísindanámi, og reyndar einnig ummæli þátttakenda hér, renna stoðum undir þörf á markvissum stuðningi og samvirkni við þróun slíkra kennsluhátta og betra aðgengi að búnaði og gögnum en raun ber vitni (sbr. samantekt Bennett, 2003, sjá einnig Shulman, 1987). Ekki nægir að marka opinbera stefnu í aðalnámskrá, heldur þarf raunhæfa stefnumörkun innan og utan skólans og dyggan stuðning við samfélag fagkennara á þessu sviði. Abstract Learning science with ICT This small-scale research study reports on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in school science and the way in which the views which teachers have of science teaching are reflected in the way they use ICT. Some research on teaching indicates that teaching practices are often subject-specific. Other research on science teaching suggests that the nature of school science is such that teachers could incorporate the use of ICT quite effectively in their teaching practice. Earlier research on the origins and production of national curriculum on information and technology education found that those preparing the national curriculum guidelines issued in 1999 (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999b) had overestimated the capacity of the existing school system to absorb fundamental change in teaching practice called for by using ICT (Allyson Macdonald, Þorsteinn Hjartarson & Þuríður Jóhannsdóttir, 2005). The national guidelines for science released in 1999 (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999a) has three components: The nature and function of science, content areas (biological, geological and physical sciences) and skills and methods needed for science. The use of ICT is recommended in several of the objectives in the national guidelines. The research study described here looked at the use of ICT by five science teachers. To describe and analyse the use, the authors drew on the Computer Practice Framework developed by Twining (2002), on a model of the suitability of ICT for developing procedural knowledge in science (Baggott La Velle, McFarlane & Brawn, 2003), and on the different roles given to students when ICT is used in science (Newton & Rogers, 2003), such as receiver, explorer, creator or reviser. A purposive snowball sample of five respected science teachers in the urban southwest was selected and all five teachers were willing to discuss their views on science teaching with us and grant us access to their science classrooms for about one hour. The discussion started with description of lessons that went well and we gained a good idea of their views on what works well, the problems faced in teaching science and in using ICT. We returned a few days later to follow a lesson selected by the teacher, and this was followed by a brief discussion of points arising from the observation, some of which were related to the earlier discussions. All five teachers used ICT, though in different ways. Two of the teachers used it mainly to present information to students in classes in slide presentations (Aðalsteinn, Saga), casting their students in the role of receivers. Saga referred to technical difficulties and poor access to computers, as well as her own inability. Aðalsteinn did not use a data projector at the time of the study, using a TV monitor instead to show slides. Two expected their students to use ICT quite a lot, casting them in the role of explorers, one as a means for students to access relevant information (Ólína) and the other more as creators, as a way of recording, Meyvant Þórólfsson, Allyson Macdonald og Eggert Lárusson
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.