Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Qupperneq 104

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Qupperneq 104
102 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009 rannsókninni má ætla að starfskenning hvers og eins fimmmenninganna hafi ráðið meiru um notkun UST og þar með sýn hvers og eins þeirra á hana, en sérstaða greinarinnar og sú menning eða hefð sem henni fylgir (sbr. subject-specific practice). Af þessu leiðir að þau markmið sem falla undir „vinnubrögð og færni“ og „hlutverk og eðli náttúruvísinda“ samkvæmt náttúrufræðinámskránni 1999 virtust veik og óljós í kennsluháttum kennaranna fimm. Rannsóknir á notkun UST í náttúruvísindanámi, og reyndar einnig ummæli þátttakenda hér, renna stoðum undir þörf á markvissum stuðningi og samvirkni við þróun slíkra kennsluhátta og betra aðgengi að búnaði og gögnum en raun ber vitni (sbr. samantekt Bennett, 2003, sjá einnig Shulman, 1987). Ekki nægir að marka opinbera stefnu í aðalnámskrá, heldur þarf raunhæfa stefnumörkun innan og utan skólans og dyggan stuðning við samfélag fagkennara á þessu sviði. Abstract Learning science with ICT This small-scale research study reports on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in school science and the way in which the views which teachers have of science teaching are reflected in the way they use ICT. Some research on teaching indicates that teaching practices are often subject-specific. Other research on science teaching suggests that the nature of school science is such that teachers could incorporate the use of ICT quite effectively in their teaching practice. Earlier research on the origins and production of national curriculum on information and technology education found that those preparing the national curriculum guidelines issued in 1999 (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999b) had overestimated the capacity of the existing school system to absorb fundamental change in teaching practice called for by using ICT (Allyson Macdonald, Þorsteinn Hjartarson & Þuríður Jóhannsdóttir, 2005). The national guidelines for science released in 1999 (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999a) has three components: The nature and function of science, content areas (biological, geological and physical sciences) and skills and methods needed for science. The use of ICT is recommended in several of the objectives in the national guidelines. The research study described here looked at the use of ICT by five science teachers. To describe and analyse the use, the authors drew on the Computer Practice Framework developed by Twining (2002), on a model of the suitability of ICT for developing procedural knowledge in science (Baggott La Velle, McFarlane & Brawn, 2003), and on the different roles given to students when ICT is used in science (Newton & Rogers, 2003), such as receiver, explorer, creator or reviser. A purposive snowball sample of five respected science teachers in the urban southwest was selected and all five teachers were willing to discuss their views on science teaching with us and grant us access to their science classrooms for about one hour. The discussion started with description of lessons that went well and we gained a good idea of their views on what works well, the problems faced in teaching science and in using ICT. We returned a few days later to follow a lesson selected by the teacher, and this was followed by a brief discussion of points arising from the observation, some of which were related to the earlier discussions. All five teachers used ICT, though in different ways. Two of the teachers used it mainly to present information to students in classes in slide presentations (Aðalsteinn, Saga), casting their students in the role of receivers. Saga referred to technical difficulties and poor access to computers, as well as her own inability. Aðalsteinn did not use a data projector at the time of the study, using a TV monitor instead to show slides. Two expected their students to use ICT quite a lot, casting them in the role of explorers, one as a means for students to access relevant information (Ólína) and the other more as creators, as a way of recording, Meyvant Þórólfsson, Allyson Macdonald og Eggert Lárusson
Qupperneq 1
Qupperneq 2
Qupperneq 3
Qupperneq 4
Qupperneq 5
Qupperneq 6
Qupperneq 7
Qupperneq 8
Qupperneq 9
Qupperneq 10
Qupperneq 11
Qupperneq 12
Qupperneq 13
Qupperneq 14
Qupperneq 15
Qupperneq 16
Qupperneq 17
Qupperneq 18
Qupperneq 19
Qupperneq 20
Qupperneq 21
Qupperneq 22
Qupperneq 23
Qupperneq 24
Qupperneq 25
Qupperneq 26
Qupperneq 27
Qupperneq 28
Qupperneq 29
Qupperneq 30
Qupperneq 31
Qupperneq 32
Qupperneq 33
Qupperneq 34
Qupperneq 35
Qupperneq 36
Qupperneq 37
Qupperneq 38
Qupperneq 39
Qupperneq 40
Qupperneq 41
Qupperneq 42
Qupperneq 43
Qupperneq 44
Qupperneq 45
Qupperneq 46
Qupperneq 47
Qupperneq 48
Qupperneq 49
Qupperneq 50
Qupperneq 51
Qupperneq 52
Qupperneq 53
Qupperneq 54
Qupperneq 55
Qupperneq 56
Qupperneq 57
Qupperneq 58
Qupperneq 59
Qupperneq 60
Qupperneq 61
Qupperneq 62
Qupperneq 63
Qupperneq 64
Qupperneq 65
Qupperneq 66
Qupperneq 67
Qupperneq 68
Qupperneq 69
Qupperneq 70
Qupperneq 71
Qupperneq 72
Qupperneq 73
Qupperneq 74
Qupperneq 75
Qupperneq 76
Qupperneq 77
Qupperneq 78
Qupperneq 79
Qupperneq 80
Qupperneq 81
Qupperneq 82
Qupperneq 83
Qupperneq 84
Qupperneq 85
Qupperneq 86
Qupperneq 87
Qupperneq 88
Qupperneq 89
Qupperneq 90
Qupperneq 91
Qupperneq 92
Qupperneq 93
Qupperneq 94
Qupperneq 95
Qupperneq 96
Qupperneq 97
Qupperneq 98
Qupperneq 99
Qupperneq 100
Qupperneq 101
Qupperneq 102
Qupperneq 103
Qupperneq 104
Qupperneq 105
Qupperneq 106
Qupperneq 107
Qupperneq 108
Qupperneq 109
Qupperneq 110
Qupperneq 111
Qupperneq 112
Qupperneq 113
Qupperneq 114
Qupperneq 115
Qupperneq 116
Qupperneq 117
Qupperneq 118
Qupperneq 119
Qupperneq 120
Qupperneq 121
Qupperneq 122
Qupperneq 123
Qupperneq 124
Qupperneq 125
Qupperneq 126
Qupperneq 127
Qupperneq 128
Qupperneq 129
Qupperneq 130
Qupperneq 131
Qupperneq 132
Qupperneq 133
Qupperneq 134
Qupperneq 135
Qupperneq 136
Qupperneq 137
Qupperneq 138
Qupperneq 139
Qupperneq 140
Qupperneq 141
Qupperneq 142
Qupperneq 143
Qupperneq 144
Qupperneq 145
Qupperneq 146
Qupperneq 147
Qupperneq 148
Qupperneq 149
Qupperneq 150
Qupperneq 151
Qupperneq 152
Qupperneq 153
Qupperneq 154
Qupperneq 155
Qupperneq 156
Qupperneq 157
Qupperneq 158
Qupperneq 159
Qupperneq 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direct Links

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.