Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Page 104

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2009, Page 104
102 Tímarit um menntarannsóknir, 6. árgangur 2009 rannsókninni má ætla að starfskenning hvers og eins fimmmenninganna hafi ráðið meiru um notkun UST og þar með sýn hvers og eins þeirra á hana, en sérstaða greinarinnar og sú menning eða hefð sem henni fylgir (sbr. subject-specific practice). Af þessu leiðir að þau markmið sem falla undir „vinnubrögð og færni“ og „hlutverk og eðli náttúruvísinda“ samkvæmt náttúrufræðinámskránni 1999 virtust veik og óljós í kennsluháttum kennaranna fimm. Rannsóknir á notkun UST í náttúruvísindanámi, og reyndar einnig ummæli þátttakenda hér, renna stoðum undir þörf á markvissum stuðningi og samvirkni við þróun slíkra kennsluhátta og betra aðgengi að búnaði og gögnum en raun ber vitni (sbr. samantekt Bennett, 2003, sjá einnig Shulman, 1987). Ekki nægir að marka opinbera stefnu í aðalnámskrá, heldur þarf raunhæfa stefnumörkun innan og utan skólans og dyggan stuðning við samfélag fagkennara á þessu sviði. Abstract Learning science with ICT This small-scale research study reports on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in school science and the way in which the views which teachers have of science teaching are reflected in the way they use ICT. Some research on teaching indicates that teaching practices are often subject-specific. Other research on science teaching suggests that the nature of school science is such that teachers could incorporate the use of ICT quite effectively in their teaching practice. Earlier research on the origins and production of national curriculum on information and technology education found that those preparing the national curriculum guidelines issued in 1999 (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999b) had overestimated the capacity of the existing school system to absorb fundamental change in teaching practice called for by using ICT (Allyson Macdonald, Þorsteinn Hjartarson & Þuríður Jóhannsdóttir, 2005). The national guidelines for science released in 1999 (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 1999a) has three components: The nature and function of science, content areas (biological, geological and physical sciences) and skills and methods needed for science. The use of ICT is recommended in several of the objectives in the national guidelines. The research study described here looked at the use of ICT by five science teachers. To describe and analyse the use, the authors drew on the Computer Practice Framework developed by Twining (2002), on a model of the suitability of ICT for developing procedural knowledge in science (Baggott La Velle, McFarlane & Brawn, 2003), and on the different roles given to students when ICT is used in science (Newton & Rogers, 2003), such as receiver, explorer, creator or reviser. A purposive snowball sample of five respected science teachers in the urban southwest was selected and all five teachers were willing to discuss their views on science teaching with us and grant us access to their science classrooms for about one hour. The discussion started with description of lessons that went well and we gained a good idea of their views on what works well, the problems faced in teaching science and in using ICT. We returned a few days later to follow a lesson selected by the teacher, and this was followed by a brief discussion of points arising from the observation, some of which were related to the earlier discussions. All five teachers used ICT, though in different ways. Two of the teachers used it mainly to present information to students in classes in slide presentations (Aðalsteinn, Saga), casting their students in the role of receivers. Saga referred to technical difficulties and poor access to computers, as well as her own inability. Aðalsteinn did not use a data projector at the time of the study, using a TV monitor instead to show slides. Two expected their students to use ICT quite a lot, casting them in the role of explorers, one as a means for students to access relevant information (Ólína) and the other more as creators, as a way of recording, Meyvant Þórólfsson, Allyson Macdonald og Eggert Lárusson
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160

x

Tímarit um menntarannsóknir

Direct Links

If you want to link to this newspaper/magazine, please use these links:

Link to this newspaper/magazine: Tímarit um menntarannsóknir
https://timarit.is/publication/1140

Link to this issue:

Link to this page:

Link to this article:

Please do not link directly to images or PDFs on Timarit.is as such URLs may change without warning. Please use the URLs provided above for linking to the website.