Náttúrufræðingurinn

Årgang

Náttúrufræðingurinn - 1980, Side 177

Náttúrufræðingurinn - 1980, Side 177
never nesting in stone walls like nowadays. During same period, Wheatears were common. Snow Buntings have increased in numbers since 1965. The numbers nesting on Flatey is among the densest known for Iceland. Few pairs nest in the other islets. Summarizing remarks A faunistic report, as complete as that in the present paper, has not been published for other islands around the coasts of Ice- land, with the possible exception of Grímsey. Much information is still unpublished on the subject, for other Breidafjördur islands including. Since the start of my investigations in 1974, 26 species have been recorded nesting in the area. Three more are known to have nested prior to that, a total of 29 species. Twenty-six of these have been recorded from Flatey itself, including the three which have not been found after 1974. Altogether 19 species have been found nesting in all the islets south of Flatey. Remarks on selected species Redshank and Snipe These are the most common wader species on Flatey itself, with an average density of ab. 90 prs/km2 (Snipe), and ab. 80 prs/km2 (Redshank). This is unusually dense com- parcd to other areas in Iceland (e.g. Glue 1970). Nielsen (1979) recorded 9 and 26 prs/km2 (Redshank), and 21 and 30 prs/km2 (Snipe) in the vicinity of the food-rich area of Myvatn (NE. Iceland). The difference between Flatey, on one hand, and the adjoining islets on the other, is quite striking. I believe this is the result of: (a) Flatey being inhabited, and (b) Unequal predation by Ravens. Ravens frequent thc islands in the search for eggs, during the time when most birds are laying. Since Ravens are constantly sought to kill, they are relatively more common outside the immediate vicinity of the inhabited part of Flatey. In 1975 eggs disappeared from Snipe and Redshank nests unusually much on thc eastern part of Flatey compared to the western part. The difference was statistically significant (Redshank: Xf =20.14, P <0.001; Snipe:Xi = 6.0, P < 0.05). Snipe are rare breeders in the is- lets south of F'latey, and nest on Flatey most densely on the western half. Redshank are more common than Snipe in the islets, and nest density on Flatey is greatest on the eastern half. Redshank nests are normally much better concealed than those of Snipe, and therefore presumably less vulnerable to Raven predation. The present-day breeding distribution of these species may thcrefore be explained by an unequal predation, not necessarily resulting in changes in numbers of breeding birds. Black Guillemots, and possible influence of Mink and Brown Rats Table II and Fig. 5 show that Black Guillemots have increased notably in recent years. This has also taken place in other is- lands belonging to Flatey, and probably over the whole of Flatey civil parish (A. Petersen, unpubl.). Rats probably kept Black Guillemots away from Flatey 1940 onwards. Rats are known to have effects on seabird populations (Joensen 1966, Parslow 1973, Crantp, Bourne & Saunders 1974, Atkinson 1978, Imber 1978). Rats first colonized Flatey in the early years of the 19th century, but were exterminated 7 years later (Sívertsen 1840). Flatey was again colonized by rats in 1896, and they became very troublesome by spoiling fish hung for drying in open sheds. (S. Gunnlaugsson, pers. comm.). Hörring also remarked on this in 1908. In the 1930,’s rats were very common, but primarily on the western half of Flatey, in the settlement area. When people started moving away from Flatey in the 1940’s, rats begin spread- ing also to the eastern half, coloniz- ing some of the islets. Rats were still very common in 1965, when start was made in trying to eradicate them. A real effort was not put into this until in winters 1969/70 and 1970/71, and from February 1971 on- wards no rats (or mice) have been seen in the islands. Contrary to what one would expect from 255
Side 1
Side 2
Side 3
Side 4
Side 5
Side 6
Side 7
Side 8
Side 9
Side 10
Side 11
Side 12
Side 13
Side 14
Side 15
Side 16
Side 17
Side 18
Side 19
Side 20
Side 21
Side 22
Side 23
Side 24
Side 25
Side 26
Side 27
Side 28
Side 29
Side 30
Side 31
Side 32
Side 33
Side 34
Side 35
Side 36
Side 37
Side 38
Side 39
Side 40
Side 41
Side 42
Side 43
Side 44
Side 45
Side 46
Side 47
Side 48
Side 49
Side 50
Side 51
Side 52
Side 53
Side 54
Side 55
Side 56
Side 57
Side 58
Side 59
Side 60
Side 61
Side 62
Side 63
Side 64
Side 65
Side 66
Side 67
Side 68
Side 69
Side 70
Side 71
Side 72
Side 73
Side 74
Side 75
Side 76
Side 77
Side 78
Side 79
Side 80
Side 81
Side 82
Side 83
Side 84
Side 85
Side 86
Side 87
Side 88
Side 89
Side 90
Side 91
Side 92
Side 93
Side 94
Side 95
Side 96
Side 97
Side 98
Side 99
Side 100
Side 101
Side 102
Side 103
Side 104
Side 105
Side 106
Side 107
Side 108
Side 109
Side 110
Side 111
Side 112
Side 113
Side 114
Side 115
Side 116
Side 117
Side 118
Side 119
Side 120
Side 121
Side 122
Side 123
Side 124
Side 125
Side 126
Side 127
Side 128
Side 129
Side 130
Side 131
Side 132
Side 133
Side 134
Side 135
Side 136
Side 137
Side 138
Side 139
Side 140
Side 141
Side 142
Side 143
Side 144
Side 145
Side 146
Side 147
Side 148
Side 149
Side 150
Side 151
Side 152
Side 153
Side 154
Side 155
Side 156
Side 157
Side 158
Side 159
Side 160
Side 161
Side 162
Side 163
Side 164
Side 165
Side 166
Side 167
Side 168
Side 169
Side 170
Side 171
Side 172
Side 173
Side 174
Side 175
Side 176
Side 177
Side 178
Side 179
Side 180

x

Náttúrufræðingurinn

Direkte link

Hvis du vil linke til denne avis/magasin, skal du bruge disse links:

Link til denne avis/magasin: Náttúrufræðingurinn
https://timarit.is/publication/337

Link til dette eksemplar:

Link til denne side:

Link til denne artikel:

Venligst ikke link direkte til billeder eller PDfs på Timarit.is, da sådanne webadresser kan ændres uden advarsel. Brug venligst de angivne webadresser for at linke til sitet.