Uppeldi og menntun - 01.01.2006, Síða 40

40
Kristján Kristjánsson (2001). Lífsleikni í skólum: Saga, forsendur, flokkun, vörn. Upp­
el­di og­ mennt­un, 10, 81–104.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2003). Þegnskaparmenntun. Uppel­di og­ mennt­un, 12, 31–42.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2005). Can we teach justified anger? Journal­ of Phil­osophy of
Educat­ion, 39, 671–689.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2006a). Just­ice and desert­­based emot­ions. aldershot: ashgate.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2006b). Emotional intelligence in the classroom? an aristotelian
critique. Educat­ional­ Theory, 56, 39–56.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educat­ing­ for charact­er: How our school­s can t­each resepct­ and
responsibil­it­y. New York: Bantam Books.
Matthews, G., Zeidner, M. og Roberts, R. D. (2002). Emot­ional­ int­el­l­ig­ence: Science and
myt­h. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mayer, J. D. og Cobb, C. D. (2000). Emotional policy on emotional intelligence: Does it
make sense? Educat­ional­ Psychol­og­y Review, 12, 163–183.
Menntamálaráðuneytið (1999a). Aðal­námskrá g­runnskól­a: Lífsl­eikni. Reykjavík: Mennta-
málaráðuneytið.
Menntamálaráðuneytið (1999b). Aðal­námskrá l­eikskól­a. Reykjavík: Menntamálaráðu-
neytið.
Menntamálaráðuneytið (1999c). aðal­námskrá framhal­dsskól­a: Lífsl­eikni. Reykjavík:
Menntamálaráðuneytið.
Menntamálaráðuneytið (1999d). Aðal­námskrá g­runnskól­a: Krist­in fræði, siðfræði og­ t­rúar­
brag­ðafræði. Reykjavík: Menntamálaráðuneytið.
Menntamálaráðuneytið (2006). Drög­ að nýjum námskrám fyrir g­runn­ og­ framhal­dsskól­a
veg­na st­yt­t­ing­ar námst­íma t­il­ st­údent­sprófs. Tekið af vefnum í janúar 2006 af ht­t­p://
namsskipan .is/Namskrardrog­/.
Sachs, D. (1981). How to distinguish self-respect from self-esteem. Phil­osophy and
Publ­ic Affairs, 10, 46–60.
Swann, W. B. jr. (1996). Sel­f­t­raps: The el­usive quest­ for hig­her sel­f­est­eem. Boulder: West-
view Press.
aBstraCt
a recent trend in moral education, “social and emotional learning“, incorporates the
mantra of “emotional intelligence“ (EI) as a key element in an extensive programme
of character building. This element is emphasised to an overriding extent in a recent
manual for “life skills education“ in Iceland, which provides the springboard for the
present inquiry. aristotle is often considered to be the founding father of the ideas
behind EI. In making his famous claim that the good life would have to include
appropriate emotions, aristotle obviously considered the schooling of emotions to
be an indispensable part of moral education. However, this paper casts doubt on the
assumption that aristotelians would approve of the clarion call for EI – as understood
by Goleman and the authors of the new Icelandic manual – in the classroom. v­arious
marked differences between EI and aristotelian emotional virtue are highlighted and
L Í FS LE IKn I oG T I L F InnInGAGRE InD