Hugur - 01.01.2006, Qupperneq 221

Ritdómar
219
man (ritstjórar), Reappraisals of the Scientific Re-
volution, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1990.
4 Bruce Eastwood, „On the Continuity of
Western Science form the Middle Ages“, Isis 83
(1992): 84-99.
5 Francis Bacon, Novum Organum, Chicago:
Open Court, 1994, bls. 83.
6 John Henry, The Scientific Revolution and the
Origins of Modem Science, London: Macmillan,
1997, bls. 43.
7 Pierre Bourdieu, Science of Science and Reflex-
ivity, Cambridge: Polity, 2004.
8 Peter Dear, Disciplines and Experience: The
Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
9 Peter Dear, „What is the History of Science
the History of? Early Modern Roots of the Id-
eology of Modern Science", Isis 96 (2005):
390-406, hér bls. 394-395.
10 Peter Bowler og Iwan Rhys Morus, Making
Modem Science: A Historica/ Survey, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 2005, bls. 51.
11 Andrew Cunningham og P. Williams, „De-
centering the ,Big Picture': The Origins of
Modem Science and the Modern Origins of
Science“, British Joumal for the History of Science
26 (1993): 407-432, hér bls. 417.
' ■' Jonathan Hodge, „Against ,Revolution‘ and
,Evolution‘“, Journal of the History of Biology 38
(2005): 101-121, hér bls. 102.
13 David Livingstone, Putting Science in its Place:
Geographies of Scientific Know/edge, Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press, 2003, bls. 105.
14 Karin Knorr Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How
the Sciences Make Knowledge, Cambridge MA:
Harvard University Press, 1999; Peter Galison
og David J. Stump (ritstjórar), The Disunity of
Science: Boundaries, Contexts and Power, Stan-
ford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
15Jan Golinski, Making Natural Knowledge,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
16 Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis, Unifying Biology:
The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary
Bio/ogy, Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1996, bls. 73-94.
17 Steindór J. Erlingsson, „From Haeckelian
Monist to Anti-Haeckelian Vitalist: The Trans-
formation of the Icelandic Naturalist Thorvald-
urThoroddsen (1855-1921)“, The Joumal of the
History of Biology, 35 (2002): 443-470; Steindór
J. Erlingsson, The rise of experimental zoology in
Britain in the 1920s: Hogben, Huxley, Crew, and
the Society for Experimental zoology, PhD-rit-
gerð, University of Manchester, 2005 (hægt er
að nálgast ritgerðina á Landsbókasafni íslands-
Háskólabókasafni); Steindór J. Erlingsson,
„Ráðist að rótum pósitívismans: Hugleiðing um
togstreimna á milli bresku líffræðinganna Juli-
ans Huxley og Lancelots Hogben“, væntanleg í
Skími.
18 Robert J. Richards, The Romantic Conception
of Life: Science and Philosophy in theAge of Goethe,
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,
2002; James Secord, Victorian Sensation: TheEx-
traordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret
Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of
Creation, Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press, 2000; Jonathan Harwood, Styles ofScient-
ific Thought: The German Genetics Community
1900—1933, Chicago: The University of Chic-
ago Press, 1993; Adrian Desmond, The Politics
of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine and Reform
in Radical London, Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press, 1989.
19 Sjá NickTosh, „Anachronism and Retrospec-
tive Explanation: In Defence of a Present-Cen-
tred History of Science", Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 34 (2003): 647-659.
20 David Livingstone, Putting Science in its Place.
21 Andrew Cunningham, „The Pen and the
Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of
Physiology and Anatomy before 1800, I: Old
Physiology - the Pen“, Studies in the History and
Philosophy of Biology and the Biomedical Sciences
33 (2002): 631-665; Andrew Cunningham,
„The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the
Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anato-
my before 1800, II: Old Anatomy - the Sword“,
Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology
and the Biomedical Sciences 34 (2003): 51-76.
22 Bowler og Morus, Making Modem Science,
bls. 51.
23 Cunningham og Williams, „De-centering the
,Big Picture", bls. 424.
24 David Cahn (ritstjóri), From Natural Phi/os-
ophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nine-
teenth-Century Science, Chicago: The University
of Chicago Press, 2003.
25 Paul White, Thomas Huxley: Making the JVIan
of Science“, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2003; Frank M. Turner, „The Victorian
Conflict betwcen Science and Religion: A Prof-
essional Dimension", Isis 69 (1978): 356-76.
26 David Cahn, „Looking at Nineteenth-Cent-
ury Science: An Introduction", bls. 3-15 í From
Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the Hi-
story of Nineteenth-Century Science (David Ca-
han ritstýrði), Chicago: The University of Chic-
ago Press, 2003, hér bls. 3.