Tímarit um menntarannsóknir - 01.01.2014, Side 57

Viðhorf grunnskólanemenda á Islandi og í Finnlandi til tækni og námsgreinarinnar hönnunar og smiði
ents' attitudes were more positive towards
technology and the subject Design and
Craft than the Finnish students. These
differences may partly be explained by
differences in the national curriculums, but
further examination is needed. Reviewing
the national curriculums highlighted that
despite the origins of Design and Craft
in Finland and Iceland being similar, the
Icelandic national curriculum placed grea-
ter emphasis on design and innovation,
whereas the Finnish national curriculum
focused on the development of students'
personalities and on gender issues.
Keywords: attitudes, Design and Cralt, techology,
school education, research, lceland and Finland
Heimildaskrá
Alamaki, A. (1999). How to educate students
for a technological future: Technology educa-
tion in early childhood and primary education.
Doktorsritgerð: Háskólinn í Turku.
Albarracin, D., Zanna, M., Johnson, B. og
Kumkala, G. (2005). Attitudes: Introduc-
tion and Scope. í D. Albarracin, B. Johnson
og M. Zanna (ritstjórar), The handbook of
attitudes (bls. 3-19). New Jersey: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Anderson, L. F. (1926). A history of manual
and industrial school education. New York:
Appleton.
Anttila, P. (1983). Työja työhön kasvatettavuus.
Tutkimus koulun työkasvatuksesta ja siihen
vaikuttavista tekijöista. Doktorsritgerð: Há-
skólinn í Helsinki.
Autio, O. (1997). Oppilaiden teknisten valmiuk-
sien kehittyminen peruskoulussa. Doktors-
ritgerð: Háskólinn í Helsinki.
Autio, O. og Hansen, R. (2002). Defining and
measuring technical thinking: Students'
technical abilities in Finnish comprehen-
sive schools. Journal of Technology Educa-
tion, 14(1), 5-19.
Autio og Soobik, M. (2013). A comparative
study of craft and technology education
curriculums and students' attitudes tow-
ards craft and technology in Finnish and
Estonian schools. Techne Series: Research in
Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 20(2),
17-33.
Bame, E., Dugger, W., de Vries, M. og McBee,
J. (1993). Pupils' attitudes toward techno-
logy PATT USA. Journal ofTechnology Stu-
dies, 19(1), 40-48.
Becker, K. H., og Maunsaiyat, S. (2002).
Thai students' attitudes and concepts of
technology. Journal of Technology Educa-
tion, 23(2), 6-20.
Bennett, C. A. (1926). History of manual and
industrial education up to 1887. Peoria: The
Manual Arts Press.
Bennett, C.A. (1937). History of manual and
industrial education 1870 to 1917. Peoria:
The Manual Arts Press.
Bennett, Rollnick, M., Green, G., og White,
M. (2001). The development and use of an
instrument to assess students' attitude to
the study of chemistry. International Journ-
al ofScience Education, 23(1), 833-845.
Bloom, B. S., Bertram, B. M. og Krathwohl, D.
R. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives.
New York. David McKay
Borg, K. (2006). What is sloyd? A question of
legitimacy and identity. Tidskriftfór Ldrar-
utbildning och Forskning, 23(2-3), 35-51.
Boser, R., Palmer, J. og Daugherty M. (1998).
Students attitudes toward technology in
selected technology education programs.
Journal ofTechnology Education, 20(1), 4-26.
55