Hugur - 01.01.2016, Page 142

142 Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir
Color Conscious (bls. 30–105). Ritstj. Anthony Appiah og Amy Gutmann. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Austin, J.L. 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard Uni-
versity Press.
Barck, Karlheinz. 2011. The Neurath–Horkeimer-Controversy Reconsidered: Otto
Neurath’s Erwiderung to Max Horkheimer’s Attack Against the Vienna Circle.
Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science (bls. 31-40). Ritstj. John Symons, Olga Pombo
og Juan Manuel Torres. Dordrecht: Springer.
Barnes, Elizabeth. 2014. Going Beyond the Fundamental: Feminism in Contemporary
Metaphysics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114(3), 335–351.
Brownstein, Michael og Jennifer Saul. 2016. Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Vol. 1:
Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carnap, Rudolf, Hans Hahn og Otto Neurath. 1929/1973. The Scientific Concept-
ion of the World: The Vienna Circle. Empiricism and Sociology (bls. 298–318). Rit-
stj. Marie Neurath og Robert S. Cohen. Dordrecht: Reidel. Upphaflega birt sem
Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis.
Cartieri, Francis og Potochnik, Angela. 2014. Toward Philosophy of Science’s Social
Engagement. Erkenntnis 79: 901–916.
Cartwright, Nancy, Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck og Thomas Uebel. 1996. Otto Neurath:
Philosophy between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapman, Siobhan. 2013. Susan Stebbing and the Language of Common Sense. Ba-
singstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the
Politics of Empowerment. New York/London: Routledge.
Dekker, Erwin. 2014. The Vienna circles: cultivating economic knowledge outside
academia. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 7(2): 30–53.
Dotson, Kristie. 2012. How is This Paper Philosophy? Comparative Philosophy 3(1),
3–29.
Eyja Margrét Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Hugsanir á dósum: Um hjarðhugsun og andlega
leti. Heimspekivefurinn 29. október 2010.
Fehr, Carla og Plaisance, Kathryn. 2010. Socially relevant philosophy of science: an
introduction. Synthese 177(3): 301–316.
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Galison, Peter. 1990. Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modern-
ism. Critical Inquiry 4(16), 709–752.
Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2008. Alief and Belief. Journal of Philosophy 105(10): 634–63.
Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2011. On the Epistemic Costs of Implicit Bias. Philosophical
Studies 156(1): 33–63.
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University
Press.
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science/ Whose Knowledge? Milton Keynes: Open Uni-
versity Press.
Hartsock, Nancy. 1997. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a
Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. The Second Wave: a Reader in Feminist
Theory (bls. 216–240). Ritstj. Linda Nicholson. New York: Routledge.
Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Howard, Don. 2003. Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career
of North American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury. Logical Empiricism in
Hugur 2017-6.indd 142 8/8/2017 5:53:51 PM