Hugur - 01.01.2016, Side 144

144 Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir
Russell, Bertrand og Russell, Dora. 1923. The Prospects of Industrial Civilization. New
York, 1923.
Russell, Bertrand. 1924. Logical Atomism. Contemporary British Philosophers (bls.
356–383). Ritstj. J.H. Muirhead. London: Allen and Unwin.
Russell, Bertrand. 1926. Education and the Good Life. New York: Boni & Liverwright,
1926.
Russell, Bertrand. 1930. The Conquest of Happiness. London: Horace Liveright, Inc.
Russell, Bertrand. 1935. In Praise of Idleness and Other Essays. London: Allen and
Unwin.
Russell, Bertrand. 1949. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Minneapolis: Department
of Philosophy, University of Minnesota.
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Siegetsleitner, Anne. Óútg. Susan Stebbing and the Vienna Circle on Moral
Philosophy. Fyrirlestur á SWIP UK Panel at the Joint Session of the Mind Association
and Aristotelian Society, University of Warwick, 11. júlí 2015. http://www.gmoser.
net/philosophy/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Siegetsleitner_Susan-Stebbing-and-
the-Vienna-Circle-on-Moral-Philosophy1.pdf, sótt 15. september 2016.
Stanley, Jason. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stanley, Jason. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press.
Stebbing, L. Susan. 1934. Logic in Practice. London: Methuen.
Stebbing, L. Susan. 1937. Philosophy and the Physicists. London: Dover.
Stebbing, L. Susan. 1939a. Thinking to Some Purpose. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Stebbing, L. Susan. 1939b. Philosophers and politics. Scrutiny 8: 156–163.
Stebbing, L. Susan. 1941. Ideals and Illusions. London: Watts & Co.
Symons, John, Olga Pombo, and Juan Manuel Torres. 2011. Otto Neurath and the Unity
of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Uebel, Thomas Uebel. 2010. What’s Right about Carnap, Neurath and the Left
Vienna Circle Thesis: A Refutation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41:
214–221.
Zack, Naomi. 2002. Philosophy of Science and Race. New York: Routledge.
Abstract
Analytic Philosophy as a Critical Tool: Philosophy as a Response to Fascism
and other Dehumanizing Ills
Analytic philosophy has for a long time had the image of not being a field where
social criticism is practiced. Instead, it gives the impression of putting all the
emphasis on abstract concepts that have little or no application to current affairs.
In this paper, it is acknowledged that this image is at least to a certain extent
justified. However, it is argued that there is nothing about analytic philosophy
in itself or its methods that prevents those practicing it from using it for social
criticism.
Examples are given of historical figures in analytic philosophy who played an
important role in the formation of the tradition in its first decades and at the same
time practiced social criticism: Bertrand Russell, members of the Vienna Circle,
and Susan Stebbing. The claim is made that their methods for social criticism
Hugur 2017-6.indd 144 8/8/2017 5:53:51 PM