Hugur - 01.01.2012, Blaðsíða 114

114 Erlendur Jónsson
Misch, Georg. 1912. Inngangur í Lotze 1912.
Peirce, C. S. 1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge Massachusetts:
Harvard University Press.
Perry, Ralph Barton. 1910. The Ego-Centric Predicament. The Journal of Philosophy,
Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7/1, 5–14.
Quine, W.V.O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia
University Press.
Schelling, F. W. J. 1965. Schellings Werke. Nach der Originalausgabe in neuer Anordnung
herausgegeben von Manfred Schröter. München: C. H. Beck.
Sullivan, David. 2010. Hermann Lotze. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Skoðað
20.11.2012.)
Ueberweg, Friedrich. 1865. System der Logik und Geschichte der logischen Lehren. Bonn:
Bei Adolph Marcus.
Ueberweg, Friedrich. 1923. Friedrich Ueberwegs Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie.
Die deutsche Philosophie des XIX. Jahrhunderts und der Gegenwart. Zwölfte, mit einem
Philosophen-Register versehene Auflage. Berlin: E. S. Mittler & Sohn.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Kritisch-genetische Edition.
Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Abstract
Lotze as successor and precursor
This article offers a survey of Hermann Lotze’s theoretical philosophy and puts
it in context with his main sources of inspiration and philosophers who were
directly or indirectly influenced by him. Among the latter are phenomenologists
like Husserl and Heidegger, pragmatists like James and the British idealists of
the last decades of the nineteenth century like Bradley and Bosanquet. Lotze’s
influence on Frege and Russell is more controversial. It is argued, by citation of
Lotze’s original texts, that he is the largely unnoticed precursor of important
ideas in twentieth century philosophy like naturalism, pragmatism, common
sense philosophy and attention to detail characteristic of analytic philosophy as
opposed to the grand system construction typical of nineteenth century German
philosophy out of which Lotze’s ideas originally grew. Attention is also drawn
to Lotze’s value theory and teleological idealism although it is not possible to
expand on those ideas within the framework of the article.